Apple in dock over apps

The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear Apple’s bid to kill an antitrust lawsuit over the market for iPhone apps in a case that could shield e-commerce companies from consumer claims over high commissions.

Apple in dock over apps

By Greg Stohr

The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear Apple’s bid to kill an antitrust lawsuit over the market for iPhone apps in a case that could shield e-commerce companies from consumer claims over high commissions.

The lawsuit accuses Apple of monopolising the app market so it can charge excessive commissions of 30%. Apple, backed by the Trump administration, said it can’t be sued because the commission is levied on the app developers, not the purchasers who are suing.

A victory for Apple could insulate companies that run online marketplaces and interact with consumers on behalf of third-party sellers. Companies that could be affected include Google, Amazon, and Facebook, the Supreme Court was told by Apple in its appeal.

“This is a critical question for antitrust law in the era of electronic commerce,” argued Apple.

The suit accuses Apple of thwarting competition by approving apps only if the developer agrees to let them be distributed exclusively through the App Store.

The suit, filed in federal court in Oakland, California, seeks class action status. A lawyer pressing the case has said Apple could be on the hook for hundreds of millions of dollars.

A federal appeals court let the suit go forward. The panel said Apple is serving as a distributor, selling directly to consumers through its App Store and pocketing part of the price of each app.

The Supreme Court said in 1977 that only direct purchasers, and not those who buy a product further downstream, can sue under federal antitrust law. The court said that rule was necessary to avoid “duplicative recoveries”.

The lawyers pressing the case say the consumers who filed the lawsuit meet that test. They “are undoubtedly the first party in the distribution chain to buy from the monopolist”, the group said in court papers.

Apple said it ultimately charges the commission to the developers, making consumers “indirect purchasers” who are precluded under the 1977 ruling from suing. The appeals court “expressly opened the door to duplicative recoveries by different plaintiff groups,” argued Apple.

Apple credited the App Store with helping create a “dynamic new industry”. In 2016 alone , developers earned more than $20bn through the App Store, which offers more than two million apps to consumers, the company said.

Bloomberg

more courts articles

Gary Glitter victim seeking six-figure sum in damages, court told Gary Glitter victim seeking six-figure sum in damages, court told
Man (25) in court charged with murdering his father and attempted murder of mother Man (25) in court charged with murdering his father and attempted murder of mother
Man appears in court charged with false imprisonment of woman in van Man appears in court charged with false imprisonment of woman in van

More in this section

FILE PHOTO The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission has cleared the purchase of Goodbody Stockbrokers by AIB END Goodbody Stockbrokers fined over €1.2m by Central Bank over rules breaches
Nottingham City Centre Stock Irish staff at the Body Shop wait for wages as retailer shuts stores in the Republic
Ryanair comments on Norwegian Ryanair boss O'Leary's spat with Transport Minister over Dublin Airport escalates
IE logo
Devices


UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE IRISH EXAMINER FOR TEAMS AND ORGANISATIONS
FIND OUT MORE

The Business Hub
Newsletter

News and analysis on business, money and jobs from Munster and beyond by our expert team of business writers.

Sign up
ie logo
Puzzles Logo

Play digital puzzles like crosswords, sudoku and a variety of word games including the popular Word Wheel

Lunchtime News
Newsletter

Keep up with the stories of the day with our lunchtime news wrap.

Sign up
Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited